Author Topic: Ribs- Baby back vs. St. Louis  (Read 529 times)

prudentsmoker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 253
    • View Profile
Ribs- Baby back vs. St. Louis
« on: September 12, 2019, 11:30:19 AM »
I have always thought baby back meatier, but I have met several people who prefer St. Louis. Not trying to start a war here, just curious which you prefer and why.

Thanks in advance.
Brian from Wichita

barelfly

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 385
    • View Profile
Re: Ribs- Baby back vs. St. Louis
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2019, 03:39:33 PM »
I like both. Donít really have a preference.  I guess I buy what is on sale or cheaper when I smoke ribs.

I have read from other sites that you should look for smaller BB for better outcome. Meatier doesnít always mean better, is what Iíve read - it can cause issues with even cooking.

But, thatís just what Iíve read. Maybe I should smoke ribs this weekend, one of each to see what I may like better!
Jeremy in Rio Rancho, NM
3D for lazy q
Bullet 4 burner gasser by Bull Grills
Weber Kettle with a Slow n Sear
$30 Masterbuilt Kettle Grill that is gold and at the lake!
Anova WiFi
Coleman Delux charcoal bullet smoker

tomd8

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 104
    • View Profile
Re: Ribs- Baby back vs. St. Louis
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2019, 06:53:28 PM »
Funny, I always thought the reverse....St. Louis were meatier.  I also recall on another site that folks were complaining that BB were harder to smoke with leaner meat and many guys drying them out.  For this reason I never bothered with BB and always stick with St.Louis and happy with the outcome.  Of course I may be totally wrong about BB having never tried them.
Tom from New York
SmokinIt #3 analog, Masterbuilt analog, Little Chief

old sarge

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2887
    • View Profile
Re: Ribs- Baby back vs. St. Louis
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2019, 08:28:02 PM »
Both are welcome in our home. Never met a rib I didn't like.
David from Arizona
US Army 70 - 95
SI 3D & Big Red Controller
CS 066 (retired to my son's home)
Lodge Sportsman Grill
Weber Kettle
Ducane Meridian 42 inch Grill
LEM MaxVac 1088A
LEM Big Bite #8 Grinder
Chef's Choice 665 and Rival Slicers
Old Hickory Knives
InstantPot Duo80 Plus

G man

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 87
    • View Profile
    • Gordon Radford Photography
Re: Ribs- Baby back vs. St. Louis
« Reply #4 on: November 28, 2019, 10:37:49 AM »
Baby Backs are usually less fatty....so you could say "meatier".....St. Louis Style, (just regular spare ribs trimmed) almost always have more meat and more fat, as they are larger ribs....

The term "high on the hog" fits well here.  The back ribs are from the top of the pig...(or the high point)...spares come from below. 
Gordo
50 Miles West of St. Louis, Misery
#2,  and Master Forge Big Green Vertical Charcoal Smoker, (it is now for sale!)

Grampy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
    • View Profile
Re: Ribs- Baby back vs. St. Louis
« Reply #5 on: December 04, 2019, 08:10:02 AM »
I usually buy which ever ones I can get the cheapest at the time of purchase. I actually
prefer the St. Louis cut Spare Ribs. Larger ribs and more meat IMO.
Jimmy from Arkadelphia, AR
Smokin-It #2
Woo Pig Sooie!