Author Topic: Ribs- Baby back vs. St. Louis  (Read 2535 times)

prudentsmoker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
Ribs- Baby back vs. St. Louis
« on: September 12, 2019, 11:30:19 AM »
I have always thought baby back meatier, but I have met several people who prefer St. Louis. Not trying to start a war here, just curious which you prefer and why.

Thanks in advance.
Brian from Wichita

barelfly

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 943
Re: Ribs- Baby back vs. St. Louis
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2019, 03:39:33 PM »
I like both. Don’t really have a preference.  I guess I buy what is on sale or cheaper when I smoke ribs.

I have read from other sites that you should look for smaller BB for better outcome. Meatier doesn’t always mean better, is what I’ve read - it can cause issues with even cooking.

But, that’s just what I’ve read. Maybe I should smoke ribs this weekend, one of each to see what I may like better!
Jeremy in NM
3D for lazy q
Bullet 4 burner gasser by Bull Grills
Weber Kettle with a Slow n Sear

tomd8

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 144
Re: Ribs- Baby back vs. St. Louis
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2019, 06:53:28 PM »
Funny, I always thought the reverse....St. Louis were meatier.  I also recall on another site that folks were complaining that BB were harder to smoke with leaner meat and many guys drying them out.  For this reason I never bothered with BB and always stick with St.Louis and happy with the outcome.  Of course I may be totally wrong about BB having never tried them.
Tom from New York
SmokinIt #3 analog, Masterbuilt analog, Little Chief

old sarge

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4046
Re: Ribs- Baby back vs. St. Louis
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2019, 08:28:02 PM »
Both are welcome in our home. Never met a rib I didn't like.
David from Arizona
US Army 70 - 95
SI 3D & Big Red Controller
CS 066
Lodge Sportsman Grill
Weber Kettle
Ducane Meridian 42 inch Grill
LEM MaxVac 1088A
LEM Big Bite #8 Grinder
Chef's Choice 665 and Rival Slicers
Old Hickory Knives
InstantPot Duo80 Plus

G man

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 84
    • Gordon Radford Photography
Re: Ribs- Baby back vs. St. Louis
« Reply #4 on: November 28, 2019, 10:37:49 AM »
Baby Backs are usually less fatty....so you could say "meatier".....St. Louis Style, (just regular spare ribs trimmed) almost always have more meat and more fat, as they are larger ribs....

The term "high on the hog" fits well here.  The back ribs are from the top of the pig...(or the high point)...spares come from below. 
Gordo
50 Miles West of St. Louis, Misery
#2,  and Master Forge Big Green Vertical Charcoal Smoker, (it is now for sale!)

Grampy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 648
Re: Ribs- Baby back vs. St. Louis
« Reply #5 on: December 04, 2019, 08:10:02 AM »
I usually buy which ever ones I can get the cheapest at the time of purchase. I actually
prefer the St. Louis cut Spare Ribs. Larger ribs and more meat IMO.
Jimmy from Arkadelphia, AR
Smokin-It #2
Woo Pig Sooie!

lgboro

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Ribs- Baby back vs. St. Louis
« Reply #6 on: December 07, 2019, 05:29:45 PM »
Sam's Club baby backs usually have more meat than other stores in my area.  I've not cooked a bad one yet but that was on a cheap gas smoker...can't wait to smoke them on my new SmokinIt.
Larry from Eastern NC
Retired 1/2 time camper
SmokinIt #1 Smoker
Numerous grills
Outside Kitchen